Residents above Vic tunnel seeking $5.4m

Dozens of Victorians who will have the West Gate Tunnel dug beneath their properties are claiming compensation from the state government. 

Ninety Yarraville residents and commercial landowners have signed up to an action run by law firm Slater and Gordon, claiming the $6.7 billion tunnel will cause the value of their properties to drop.

They are seeking up to 10 per cent of each property’s value in damages, totalling $5.4 million for the 74 residential cases.  

Lawyer Adrian McMillan is leading the action, which has been underway for some time but negotiations with the government have stalled. 

“We’re really reaching a critical point here; they’ve continued to dig in and if a resolution isn’t reached, we’ll have to either take it to VCAT or the Supreme Court,” he told reporters on Tuesday.

“It comes down to the pretty basic question: Would you rather buy a house that was above a tunnel or one that wasn’t above a tunnel?

“The market evidence points to the fact that there is a diminution in the value of these properties that sit above these tunnels at the date of the acquisition.”

Mr McMillain said the claimants all have land titles created before 1891, meaning they own the land to the centre of the earth. Titles issued after that year grant ownership to only 50 feet – or about 15 metres.

“Seems a bit strange to think about but you own all the land under your house and the government to build a tunnel has to compulsorily acquire your interest in that land and you’re entitled to compensation,” he said. 

“It’s a little bit like VicRoads taking a slice off the corner of your land for a roundabout – it’s a partial acquisition. This is just another way that they’re acquiring a part of your land.”

Transport Infrastructure Minister Jacinta Allan said claims would be considered on a “case-by-case” basis but noted prices of homes atop major projects such as CityLink and East Link have been unaffected.

“The reason why we have to look at building more tunnels through Melbourne as it stands today is because the alternative would be to take thousands and thousands of properties above ground at grade to do this sort of work,” she said.

“This is a very sensitive process, we’ll work through it very carefully on a case by case basis.”

Opposition Leader Michael O’Brien said claimants should be fairly compensated if major projects detrimentally impacted their property’s value.

“Victorians just deserve fairness,” he told reporters.

“If the government’s going to take your land, if the government’s going to reduce the value of your home, you’re entitled to be compensated for it.”

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.